🔒 K51 — Innosuisse Innovation Project

CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT AWH Business Case — March 2026

Innosuisse Innovation Project — Business Case

Value Creation & Implementation Plan

Project Title: Integration of Waste-Heat-Driven Atmospheric Water Harvesting (AWH) into Greenhouse-Coupled Datacenter Infrastructure

Implementation Partner: K51 AG, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf Research Partner: Empa — Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Urban Energy Systems Lab (Dr. Binod Koirala) Technology Partner: Solabs Nanotechnology (Fabrice Bagnoud, ETH Zurich)


3.1 Business Targets and Business Model

Business model and target value chain position

K51 AG operates datacenter containers as fossil-free heating systems for commercial greenhouses. The company's infrastructure is deployed directly at agricultural sites, where computing hardware generates waste heat that replaces fossil fuels for greenhouse climate control.

K51's current value chain position is that of an integrated infrastructure operator, combining:

The proposed Innosuisse project adds a third value layer: waste-heat-driven water production and dehumidification through Atmospheric Water Harvesting (AWH) based on sorbent technology developed at ETH Zurich.

This transforms K51's business model from a dual-revenue system (compute + heat) to a triple-revenue system (compute + heat + water/dehumidification), fundamentally improving the economic viability and year-round operability of the infrastructure.

The research foundation is provided by Empa (Urban Energy Systems Lab), which will validate system performance, energy balances, and integration parameters under controlled and real-world conditions. The sorbent technology is developed by the Solabs team (ETH Zurich), who bring deep expertise in thermochemical absorption systems. K51 acts as the implementation partner, providing real datacenter-greenhouse infrastructure, operational know-how, and the commercial pathway to market.

A potential spin-off company ("NewCo") may emerge from the project to commercialize AWH technology independently in broader markets (e.g., standalone datacenter cooling). K51's interest, however, is focused on securing exclusive usage rights for the greenhouse-integrated application in Switzerland and selected European markets.

Customer issues, pain points, and social challenges

Pain points of Swiss greenhouse operators

Swiss greenhouse operators face a convergence of economic and regulatory pressures that fundamentally threaten their business model:

Mandatory decarbonization. Major Swiss retailers (Migros, Coop) increasingly require their agricultural suppliers to eliminate fossil fuel use. Erdgas (natural gas), historically the dominant heating source for greenhouses, is becoming a non-option. Operators must find fossil-free heating alternatives or risk losing their primary sales channels.

High energy costs for dehumidification. Greenhouse crops continuously release moisture. The standard practice for humidity control is "dry heating" combined with roof venting — heating the air to absorb moisture, then venting the warm, moist air outside. This process wastes up to 30–40% of total heating energy and causes significant CO₂ losses, which must be compensated by purchasing additional CO₂. In Switzerland, CO₂ emissions from greenhouses are increasingly regulated, making CO₂-neutral climate control economically critical.

Increasing water scarcity. While Switzerland is not traditionally considered water-stressed, seasonal droughts are increasing, particularly during summer months. Greenhouse irrigation demands are substantial, and on-site water production represents both an economic advantage and a resilience factor.

No integrated solution available. Greenhouse operators today must procure heating, dehumidification, and water separately from different providers or systems, each with its own cost structure. No commercially available system delivers all three services from a single waste-heat source.

Pain points of K51 (implementation partner)

K51's current business model faces a structural constraint that limits profitability and hardware choices:

Seasonal operation only. Under Swiss zoning law (RPG), datacenter infrastructure in agricultural zones must provide a direct agricultural benefit. Since K51's primary service is heat delivery, computing operations are strictly heat-driven — the datacenter runs only when the greenhouse requires heat. This limits annual operating hours to approximately 4'500–6'000 hours (heating season only), with no operations during summer.

Low-value computing hardware. Because uptime cannot be guaranteed year-round, K51 cannot offer Service Level Agreements (SLAs) required by high-value computing customers (AI inference, rendering, scientific computing). The company is limited to low-end, interruptible workloads (e.g., Bitcoin mining, batch processing) that generate only approximately CHF 0.10 per kWh of electrical input — barely covering operating costs.

Marginal profitability. With current unit economics (see financial plan below), a 1 MW installation generates a Free Cashflow of only approximately CHF 30'000 per year — insufficient for meaningful reinvestment or risk buffering.

The core problem is not heat — it is the inability to operate year-round. K51 needs a legitimate, regulation-compliant agricultural service that requires waste heat during summer months. AWH-based water production and dehumidification is precisely this service.

Differentiation and Unique Selling Proposition (USP)

K51's USP is not the AWH technology itself, but the system-level integration of computing, heating, dehumidification, and water production into a single infrastructure that serves two customers simultaneously:

1. "Three-in-one" infrastructure for the farmer. A single K51 installation replaces the greenhouse operator's heating system, dehumidification system, and part of the water supply. No other provider offers all three services from waste heat.

2. Year-round datacenter operation in agricultural zones. By adding AWH, K51 transforms seasonal heating infrastructure into permanent agricultural infrastructure (heating in winter, water production and dehumidification in summer), enabling continuous operation within the existing regulatory framework.

3. High-value computing through guaranteed uptime. Year-round operation enables K51 to deploy high-performance GPU servers with SLA-grade availability, unlocking compute revenues of CHF 0.80/kWh instead of CHF 0.10/kWh — an 8× improvement per kilowatt-hour.

4. Shared-cost economics. The AWH unit serves two beneficiaries (datacenter cooling + agricultural water/dehumidification), allowing costs to be shared. This creates economics that neither standalone datacenter cooling nor standalone agricultural dehumidification can achieve independently.

5. Proprietary integration know-how. K51 has operational experience integrating liquid-cooled computing hardware into agricultural heating systems. The AWH integration adds a new layer of system complexity that represents a significant barrier to entry for competitors.

Market size and addressable market

Swiss greenhouse market (beachhead)

European greenhouse market (medium-term)

Datacenter cooling market (long-term, via potential spin-off)

Market position and competitors

Greenhouse heating

K51's primary competitors for greenhouse heating are:

K51 is unique in providing fossil-free heat at a fixed price below natural gas (CHF 0.08/kWh including hardware allocation vs. CHF 0.08–0.10/kWh for natural gas), while simultaneously generating computing revenue that subsidizes the heat price.

Greenhouse dehumidification

Current dehumidification approaches:

The proposed AWH system is the only solution that provides heat-driven dehumidification without additional electrical input, using datacenter waste heat as the sole energy source.

Atmospheric Water Harvesting

Existing AWH companies (Genesis Systems, Uravu Labs) operate standalone, electrically powered units for drinking water production. None are designed for integration with datacenter thermal systems, and none offer combined dehumidification + water production from waste heat.

Competitive advantage

Revenue streams

K51 generates revenue from three independent streams per installation:

1. Compute Revenue

2. Heat Revenue

3. Water & Dehumidification Revenue (new, enabled by AWH)

Willingness to pay

Heat: Swiss greenhouse operators currently pay CHF 0.08–0.10/kWh for natural gas. K51's price of CHF 0.08/kWh for fossil-free heat is competitive and eliminates decarbonization risk. Willingness to pay is validated through existing contracts.

Water: Municipal water in Switzerland costs CHF 1.50–3.00/m³. K51's price of CHF 5.00/m³ is above municipal water rates but includes:

When accounting for the combined value of water + dehumidification + reduced CO₂ loss + reduced heating energy, the effective cost to the farmer is significantly below the standalone cost of each service procured separately.

Profit-sharing: In addition to the fixed-price heat and water contracts, K51 offers greenhouse operators a 30% share of the Free Cashflow generated on their site. This profit-sharing model aligns incentives and compensates the farmer for hosting the infrastructure. It is modeled on K51's proven approach in France, where a 50% FCF split is offered to early adopters.

Cost structure and required resources

Per 1 MW installation

Capital expenditure (one-time):

Item CHF
AWH sorption unit (200 kW, containerized) 75'000
GPU hardware upgrade (Low-End → High-End, 100 kW) 150'000
Total CAPEX per site 225'000

Annual operating costs (steady state, Year 3+):

Item Calculation CHF/year
Electricity ASIC 4'500'000 kWh × CHF 0.13 585'000
Electricity GPU (heating season) 500'000 kWh × CHF 0.13 65'000
Electricity GPU (summer, AWH-enabled) 376'000 kWh × CHF 0.13 48'880
Total electricity 698'880
Infrastructure maintenance Flat rate 40'000
IT operations (K51 remote management) Flat rate 80'000
AWH sorption maintenance Flat rate 10'000
AWH depreciation (CHF 75k / 10 years) Linear 7'500
Total operating costs (excl. electricity) 137'500
ASIC hardware reserve 4'500'000 kWh × CHF 0.02 90'000
GPU hardware reserve (High-End) 876'000 kWh × CHF 0.15 131'400
Total hardware reserves 221'400
TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS 1'057'780

Innosuisse project costs

The total project budget for the Innosuisse innovation project is estimated at approximately CHF 820'000 over 24 months, covering:

Budget allocation between partners is subject to finalization (see Section: Open Items).

Revenue and profitability development (5-year plan)

Scenario A: WITHOUT AWH / WITHOUT Innosuisse funding (baseline)

Per 1 MW installation, all values in CHF

Year 1 (2026) Year 2 (2027) Year 3 (2028) Year 4 (2029) Year 5 (2030) Cumulative
REVENUE
Compute ASIC (900kW × 5'000h × 0.10) 450'000 450'000 450'000 450'000 450'000 2'250'000
Compute GPU Low-End (100kW × 5'000h × 0.10) 50'000 50'000 50'000 50'000 50'000 250'000
Heat sales (5'000'000 kWh × 0.08) 400'000 400'000 400'000 400'000 400'000 2'000'000
Water sales 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue 900'000 900'000 900'000 900'000 900'000 4'500'000
COSTS
Electricity ASIC (4'500'000 kWh × 0.13) -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -2'925'000
Electricity GPU (500'000 kWh × 0.13) -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -325'000
Infrastructure maintenance -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -200'000
IT operations -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -400'000
ASIC reserve (4'500'000 × 0.02) -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -450'000
GPU reserve (500'000 × 0.02) -10'000 -10'000 -10'000 -10'000 -10'000 -50'000
Total Costs -870'000 -870'000 -870'000 -870'000 -870'000 -4'350'000
Free Cashflow 30'000 30'000 30'000 30'000 30'000 150'000

Conclusion: Without AWH, K51's greenhouse-coupled datacenter model operates at near break-even. The business is sustainable but generates insufficient cashflow for meaningful growth, reinvestment, or risk buffering.

Scenario B: WITH AWH / WITH Innosuisse funding

Per 1 MW installation, all values in CHF

Year 1: Innosuisse project start, Empa prototype — no commercial AWH operation. Year 2: Field deployment at Imhof Bio from Q2 — 75% operational year for AWH. Years 3–5: Full commercial AWH operation.

Year 1 (2026) Year 2 (2027) Year 3 (2028) Year 4 (2029) Year 5 (2030) Cumulative
REVENUE
Compute Revenue
Compute ASIC (900kW × 5'000h × 0.10) 450'000 450'000 450'000 450'000 450'000 2'250'000
Compute GPU Low-End (100kW × h × 0.10) 50'000 12'500 0 0 0 62'500
Compute GPU High-End (100kW × h × 0.80) 0 525'600 700'800 700'800 700'800 2'628'000
Total Compute Revenue 500'000 988'100 1'150'800 1'150'800 1'150'800 4'940'500
Heat & Water Revenue
Heat sales (5'000'000 kWh × 0.08) 400'000 400'000 400'000 400'000 400'000 2'000'000
Water sales (m³ × 5.00) 0 5'913 7'884 7'884 7'884 29'565
Total Heat & Water Revenue 400'000 405'913 407'884 407'884 407'884 2'029'565
Total Revenue 900'000 1'394'013 1'558'684 1'558'684 1'558'684 6'970'065
COSTS
Electricity
Electricity ASIC (4'500'000 kWh × 0.13) -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -585'000 -2'925'000
Electricity GPU heating season (500'000 kWh × 0.13) -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -65'000 -325'000
Electricity GPU summer / AWH (kWh × 0.13) 0 -36'660 -48'880 -48'880 -48'880 -183'300
Total Electricity -650'000 -686'660 -698'880 -698'880 -698'880 -3'433'300
Operating Costs
Infrastructure maintenance -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -40'000 -200'000
IT operations (K51 remote management) -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -80'000 -400'000
AWH sorption maintenance 0 -7'500 -10'000 -10'000 -10'000 -37'500
AWH depreciation (75k / 10 years) 0 -5'625 -7'500 -7'500 -7'500 -28'125
Total Operating Costs -120'000 -133'125 -137'500 -137'500 -137'500 -665'625
Hardware Reserves
ASIC reserve (4'500'000 kWh × 0.02) -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -90'000 -450'000
GPU reserve Low-End (kWh × 0.02) -10'000 -2'500 0 0 0 -12'500
GPU reserve High-End (kWh × 0.15) 0 -98'550 -131'400 -131'400 -131'400 -492'750
Total Hardware Reserves -100'000 -191'050 -221'400 -221'400 -221'400 -955'250
Total Costs -870'000 -1'010'835 -1'057'780 -1'057'780 -1'057'780 -5'054'175
Free Cashflow (before split) 30'000 383'178 500'904 500'904 500'904 1'915'890
Farmer profit share (30%) 0 -114'953 -150'271 -150'271 -150'271 -565'767
K51 net cashflow (70%) 30'000 268'225 350'633 350'633 350'633 1'350'123

Capital expenditure (Year 2):

Item CHF
AWH sorption unit (200 kW) -75'000
GPU upgrade (Low-End → High-End, 100 kW) -150'000
Total CAPEX -225'000

K51 net cashflow after CAPEX (5 years cumulative): CHF 1'125'123

NPV comparison (discount rate: 8%)

Scenario NPV K51 (5 years)
A: Without AWH, without Innosuisse CHF ~123'000
B: With AWH, with Innosuisse CHF ~813'000
Delta CHF ~690'000

Without Innosuisse funding

Without public co-funding, development would proceed at a slower pace:

Innosuisse funding is therefore critical not only for reducing financial risk, but for accelerating market entry by enabling parallel development of the laboratory prototype and commercial deployment.

Revenue generation and self-sustainability

K51 is an established, revenue-generating company. The AWH integration does not require K51 to find a new business model — it enhances an existing, proven model.

Self-sustainability is achieved through:

  1. Existing heat contracts provide stable baseline revenue from day one
  2. Compute revenue scales with operational hours — AWH enables the transition from seasonal to year-round operation
  3. Water contracts add a third revenue stream with minimal incremental cost
  4. Profit-sharing model aligns farmer incentives without requiring upfront subsidies

After the Innosuisse project concludes (end of Year 2), K51 operates the AWH-integrated system commercially without further public funding.


3.2 Potential Customers and How They Are Reached

Customer model

B2B. K51 sells infrastructure services (heat, water, dehumidification) directly to commercial greenhouse operators under long-term contracts.

Target customers

Primary: Swiss greenhouse operators under decarbonization pressure

Secondary: European greenhouse operators (France, Netherlands, Germany)

Market access and marketing approach

K51's market access is relationship-driven and infrastructure-based, not mass-market:

  1. Existing customer base. K51 already operates datacenter-greenhouse installations. AWH is offered as an upgrade to existing customers first.
  2. Agricultural networks. K51 works with Bio Suisse, Les Maraîchers Nantais (France), and direct contacts with greenhouse operators through industry events.
  3. Reference installations. The Innosuisse-funded pilot at Imhof Bio serves as a demonstration site. Validated performance data and farmer testimonials are the most powerful marketing tools in the agricultural sector.
  4. Research credibility. The Empa partnership and Innosuisse label provide institutional credibility that accelerates trust-building with conservative agricultural customers.
  5. Multiplier partnerships. K51 works with AXPO (Swiss energy utility) for lead generation and site identification, particularly for sites with favorable grid connections.

Implementation plan

Phase Timeline Milestone
Innosuisse project start Q1 2026 Funding approved, team mobilized
Laboratory prototype (10 kW) Q2–Q4 2026 Performance validation at Empa
Containerized pilot (200 kW) Q4 2026–Q1 2027 System built, integration tested
Field deployment at Imhof Bio Q1 2027 First real-world operation
Performance validation & optimization Q1–Q4 2027 12 months of operational data
Commercial rollout (2nd installation) Q1 2028 Proven system deployed at new site
Scale-up (5+ installations) 2028–2030 Series production of AWH units

Go-to-market strategy and early market traction

Proof of early market traction:

  1. Existing installation at Imhof Bio, Schwerzenbach: 2 × 1 MW K51 containers operational, with thermal integration into the greenhouse heating system. This site is confirmed as the location for the AWH field pilot.

  2. Active expansion in France: 4 × 1 MW installations planned in Nantes region for 2026, with farmer partnerships established through Les Maraîchers Nantais (Flavie Morin, Directrice).

  3. Institutional partnerships: Formal collaboration with Empa (Dr. Binod Koirala, Reto Largo) and Solabs (Fabrice Bagnoud, ETH Zurich environment).

  4. Customer demand validated: Greenhouse operators have expressed interest in combined heat + dehumidification solutions. The decarbonization pressure from retail customers (Migros, Coop) creates urgency.

  5. MoU signed: A Memorandum of Understanding between K51 and the Solabs technology team governs the collaboration framework, IP principles, and commercialization path.


3.3 Energy, Ecological, and Social Relevance

Higher purpose

The project transforms datacenter waste heat — currently the largest source of inefficiency in digital infrastructure — into clean water and climate services for agriculture. It demonstrates that computing and food production can be symbiotic rather than competing uses of energy and land.

Concrete contributions

Energy efficiency and resource optimization

Clean water and sanitation

Climate protection

Circular economy

Social acceptance and quality of life

Benefit for Swiss society and economy

The project creates value at multiple levels:

  1. For Swiss agriculture: A commercially viable pathway to decarbonize greenhouse operations while reducing water dependency and energy costs.
  2. For Swiss digital infrastructure: A model for deploying computing infrastructure in a socially and environmentally responsible manner, with potential to position Switzerland as a leader in sustainable datacenter design.
  3. For Swiss innovation: The project translates ETH-origin research into a commercial product through a Swiss implementation partner, with potential for a technology spin-off that addresses global markets.
  4. For Swiss energy policy: Demonstrates that waste heat utilization, renewable water production, and efficient land use can be achieved simultaneously through system-level innovation.

The investment is justified by the combination of strong commercial viability (see financial plan), significant environmental benefit, and the creation of exportable know-how through the Empa–ETH–K51 collaboration.


Open Items (to be finalized)

Item Status Timeline
IP ownership and licensing terms (K51 exclusive rights for greenhouse application) To be discussed with Solabs team Next week
Detailed budget allocation between K51, Empa, and Solabs To be jointly developed and challenged Before submission
Letter of Intent from Imhof Bio (pilot site confirmation) To be obtained Before submission
Exact Innosuisse co-funding ratio and K51 cash contribution To be confirmed with Innosuisse Before submission
NewCo spin-off structure (if applicable) Preliminary, not required for submission Post-project